Mauritania vs Uganda: PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim
PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim over time
- Mauritania
- Uganda
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Uganda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.0% | 99.8% | 0.2% | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 99.5% | 98.8% | 0.7% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 98.4% | 100.0% | 1.6% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim, Mauritania or Uganda?
- Mauritania, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Uganda as of 2017.
- What is the difference in pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim between Mauritania and Uganda?
- 0.0%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Uganda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
- How do Mauritania and Uganda rank globally for pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim?
- Mauritania ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-1 value (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percent of population exposed to ambient concentrations of PM2.5 that exceed the World Health Organization (WHO) Interim Target 1 (IT-1) is defined as the portion of a country’s population living in places where mean annual concentrations of PM2.5 are greater than 35 micrograms per cubic meter. The Air Quality Guideline (AQG) of 10 micrograms per cubic meter is recommended by the WHO as the lower end of the range of concentrations over which adverse health effects due to PM2.5 exposure have been observed.