Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim
PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim, Trinidad and Tobago or Zimbabwe?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Zimbabwe as of 2017.
- What is the difference in pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim between Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe rank globally for pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-3 value (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percent of population exposed to ambient concentrations of PM2.5 that exceed the World Health Organization (WHO) Interim Target 3 (IT-3) is defined as the portion of a country’s population living in places where mean annual concentrations of PM2.5 are greater than 15 micrograms per cubic meter. The Air Quality Guideline (AQG) of 10 micrograms per cubic meter is recommended by the WHO as the lower end of the range of concentrations over which adverse health effects due to PM2.5 exposure have been observed.