Mus vs Tokelau: Population using at least basic drinking-water services
Mus
99.9%
in 2024
Tokelau
100.0%
in 2024
Mus rank
1st
Tokelau rank
1st
Population using at least basic drinking-water services over time
- Mus
- Tokelau
How they compare
Tokelau currently reports 100.0% against 99.9% in Mus, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mus ahead.
Mus ranks 1st and Tokelau ranks 1st of 2 regions.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mus averaged higher in 2 and Tokelau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.2% | 97.9% | 1.3% | Mus |
| 2010s | 99.6% | 99.3% | 0.3% | Mus |
| 2020s | 99.8% | 100.0% | 0.2% | Tokelau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population using at least basic drinking-water services, Mus or Tokelau?
- Tokelau, at 100.0% against 99.9% in Mus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in population using at least basic drinking-water services between Mus and Tokelau?
- 0.1%, with Tokelau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Tokelau?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Mus and Tokelau rank globally for population using at least basic drinking-water services?
- Mus ranks 1st and Tokelau ranks 1st of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Population using at least basic drinking-water services (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.