Argentina vs Greece: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Argentina
- Greece
How they compare
Greece currently reports 28,579 t against 26,222 t in Argentina, a difference of 2,357 t.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Greece ahead.
Argentina ranks 38th and Greece ranks 36th of 106 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27,772 t | 33,323 t | 5,551 t | Greece |
| 2010s | 19,676 t | 33,072 t | 13,397 t | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Argentina or Greece?
- Greece, at 28,579 t against 26,222 t in Argentina as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Argentina and Greece?
- 2,357 t, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Greece?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Argentina and Greece rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Argentina ranks 38th and Greece ranks 36th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf