Armenia vs Bhutan: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Armenia
- Bhutan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 21 t against 7 t in Bhutan, a difference of 14 t.
That makes Armenia's figure about 3.0 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bhutan ahead.
Armenia ranks 92nd and Bhutan ranks 95th of 106 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Bhutan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.5 t | 24.5 t | 12 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 81 t | 3 t | 78 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 160.33 t | 12.67 t | 147.67 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Armenia or Bhutan?
- Armenia, at 21 t against 7 t in Bhutan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Armenia and Bhutan?
- 14 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Bhutan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Bhutan rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Armenia ranks 92nd and Bhutan ranks 95th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf