Australia vs Ecuador: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Australia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 161,428 t against 140,339 t in Australia, a difference of 21,089 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 17th and Ecuador ranks 14th of 106 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 382,942 t | 88,686 t | 294,256 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 203,600 t | 145,462 t | 58,139 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Australia or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 161,428 t against 140,339 t in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Australia and Ecuador?
- 21,089 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Ecuador rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Australia ranks 17th and Ecuador ranks 14th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf