Australia vs Peru: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Australia
- Peru
How they compare
Australia currently reports 140,339 t against 105,624 t in Peru, a difference of 34,715 t.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Peru's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 17th and Peru ranks 19th of 106 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 382,942 t | 52,374 t | 330,568 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 204,600 t | 90,571 t | 114,030 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Australia or Peru?
- Australia, at 140,339 t against 105,624 t in Peru as of 2017.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Australia and Peru?
- 34,715 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Peru rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Australia ranks 17th and Peru ranks 19th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf