Austria vs Nigeria: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Austria
- Nigeria
How they compare
Austria currently reports 24,982 t against 21,834 t in Nigeria, a difference of 3,148 t.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 39th and Nigeria ranks 41st of 106 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20,689 t | 12,330 t | 8,358 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 25,000 t | 19,330 t | 5,670 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Austria or Nigeria?
- Austria, at 24,982 t against 21,834 t in Nigeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Austria and Nigeria?
- 3,148 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Nigeria?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Austria and Nigeria rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Austria ranks 39th and Nigeria ranks 41st of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf