Azerbaijan vs Tonga: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Azerbaijan
- Tonga
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 2,982 t against 2,045 t in Tonga, a difference of 937 t.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.5 times Tonga's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 64th and Tonga ranks 66th of 106 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,678 t | 75.25 t | 3,603 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 3,750 t | 1,730 t | 2,020 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Azerbaijan or Tonga?
- Azerbaijan, at 2,982 t against 2,045 t in Tonga as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Azerbaijan and Tonga?
- 937 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Tonga?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Azerbaijan and Tonga rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Azerbaijan ranks 64th and Tonga ranks 66th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf