Belarus vs Brazil: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Belarus
- Brazil
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 932,274 t against 408,906 t in Brazil, a difference of 523,368 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 2.3 times Brazil's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 6th and Brazil ranks 9th of 106 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.32 million t | 5.39 million t | 4.07 million t | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.29 million t | 7.41 million t | 6.11 million t | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Belarus or Brazil?
- Belarus, at 932,274 t against 408,906 t in Brazil as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Belarus and Brazil?
- 523,368 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Brazil?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Belarus and Brazil rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Brazil ranks 9th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf