Bhutan vs Iceland: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Bhutan
- Iceland
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 7 t against 1 t in Iceland, a difference of 6 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 7.0 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iceland ahead.
Bhutan ranks 95th and Iceland ranks 97th of 106 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23 t | 1,376 t | 1,353 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 13.89 t | 5.33 t | 8.56 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 12.25 t | 1.25 t | 11 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Bhutan or Iceland?
- Bhutan, at 7 t against 1 t in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Bhutan and Iceland?
- 6 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Iceland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Iceland rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Bhutan ranks 95th and Iceland ranks 97th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf