Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
325 t
in 2015
United Republic of Tanzania
448 t
in 2016
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200220092016

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 448 t against 325 t in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 123 t.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 8 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 1,505 t 1,475 t 29.62 t Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2010s 362.33 t 483.67 t 121.33 t United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 448 t against 325 t in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2016.
What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
123 t, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 8 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/potassium-chloride-muriate-of-potash-mop-agricultural-use/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/potassium-chloride-muriate-of-potash-mop-agricultural-use/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
116 places, 1,324 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf