Burundi vs Libya: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Burundi
- Libya
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 1,085 t against 1,000 t in Libya, a difference of 85 t.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Libya ahead.
Burundi ranks 75th and Libya ranks 76th of 106 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 117 t | 1,122 t | 1,005 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 573.4 t | 1,000 t | 426.6 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Burundi or Libya?
- Burundi, at 1,085 t against 1,000 t in Libya as of 2016.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Burundi and Libya?
- 85 t, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Libya?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Burundi and Libya rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Burundi ranks 75th and Libya ranks 76th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf