Cameroon vs Cuba: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Cameroon
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 52,563 t against 47,355 t in Cameroon, a difference of 5,208 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cuba ahead.
Cameroon ranks 27th and Cuba ranks 25th of 106 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23,575 t | 41,646 t | 18,071 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 31,760 t | 42,420 t | 10,659 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Cameroon or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 52,563 t against 47,355 t in Cameroon as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Cameroon and Cuba?
- 5,208 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Cuba?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Cameroon and Cuba rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Cameroon ranks 27th and Cuba ranks 25th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf