Chile vs Ghana: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Chile
- Ghana
How they compare
Chile currently reports 37,421 t against 33,986 t in Ghana, a difference of 3,435 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 30th and Ghana ranks 33rd of 106 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 707,726 t | 509.5 t | 707,216 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 45,525 t | 23,694 t | 21,831 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Chile or Ghana?
- Chile, at 37,421 t against 33,986 t in Ghana as of 2016.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Chile and Ghana?
- 3,435 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ghana?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Chile and Ghana rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Chile ranks 30th and Ghana ranks 33rd of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf