Croatia vs Sweden: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Croatia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 7,535 t against 6,557 t in Croatia, a difference of 978 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 57th and Sweden ranks 54th of 106 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96,265 t | 26,372 t | 69,893 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 36,201 t | 4,365 t | 31,836 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 10,278 t | 7,535 t | 2,743 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Croatia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 7,535 t against 6,557 t in Croatia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Croatia and Sweden?
- 978 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sweden?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Croatia and Sweden rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Croatia ranks 57th and Sweden ranks 54th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf