Cuba vs Paraguay: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Cuba
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 61,909 t against 52,563 t in Cuba, a difference of 9,346 t.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 25th and Paraguay ranks 22nd of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31,327 t | 4,371 t | 26,956 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 42,420 t | 43,380 t | 961 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Cuba or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 61,909 t against 52,563 t in Cuba as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Cuba and Paraguay?
- 9,346 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Paraguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Cuba and Paraguay rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Cuba ranks 25th and Paraguay ranks 22nd of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf