Cuba vs Romania: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Cuba
- Romania
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 52,563 t against 46,538 t in Romania, a difference of 6,025 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 25th and Romania ranks 28th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45,051 t | 35,548 t | 9,503 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 42,420 t | 49,121 t | 6,702 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Cuba or Romania?
- Cuba, at 52,563 t against 46,538 t in Romania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Cuba and Romania?
- 6,025 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2011.
- How do Cuba and Romania rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Cuba ranks 25th and Romania ranks 28th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf