Cuba vs Ukraine: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Cuba
52,563 t
in 2011
Ukraine
53,362 t
in 2024
Cuba rank
25th
Ukraine rank
24th
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Cuba
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 53,362 t against 52,563 t in Cuba, a difference of 799 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 24th of 106 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40,694 t | 111,297 t | 70,603 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 42,420 t | 187,906 t | 145,486 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Cuba or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 53,362 t against 52,563 t in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Cuba and Ukraine?
- 799 t, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Ukraine?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Cuba and Ukraine rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Cuba ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 24th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf