Czechia vs Pakistan: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Czechia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 16,589 t against 16,497 t in Pakistan, a difference of 92 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 44th and Pakistan ranks 45th of 106 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67,968 t | 3,958 t | 64,010 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 36,659 t | 18,727 t | 17,932 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 14,633 t | 32,131 t | 17,498 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Czechia or Pakistan?
- Czechia, at 16,589 t against 16,497 t in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Czechia and Pakistan?
- 92 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Pakistan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Pakistan rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Czechia ranks 44th and Pakistan ranks 45th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf