Ecuador vs Jordan: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 231,000 t against 161,428 t in Ecuador, a difference of 69,572 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 14th and Jordan ranks 12th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86,108 t | 124,756 t | 38,648 t | Jordan |
| 2010s | 152,991 t | 129,000 t | 23,991 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Ecuador or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 231,000 t against 161,428 t in Ecuador as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Ecuador and Jordan?
- 69,572 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jordan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Ecuador and Jordan rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 14th and Jordan ranks 12th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf