Egypt vs Ireland: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Egypt
- Ireland
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 13,018 t against 12,211 t in Egypt, a difference of 807 t.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Ireland ahead.
Egypt ranks 51st and Ireland ranks 49th of 106 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,468 t | 112,019 t | 110,551 t | Ireland |
| 2010s | 35,227 t | 130,114 t | 94,886 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Egypt or Ireland?
- Ireland, at 13,018 t against 12,211 t in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Egypt and Ireland?
- 807 t, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Ireland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2018.
- How do Egypt and Ireland rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Egypt ranks 51st and Ireland ranks 49th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf