El Salvador vs Nepal: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- El Salvador
- Nepal
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 6,857 t against 6,577 t in Nepal, a difference of 280 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nepal ahead.
El Salvador ranks 55th and Nepal ranks 56th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36 t | 135 t | 99 t | Nepal |
| 2010s | 14,128 t | 4,002 t | 10,126 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, El Salvador or Nepal?
- El Salvador, at 6,857 t against 6,577 t in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between El Salvador and Nepal?
- 280 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Nepal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.
- How do El Salvador and Nepal rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- El Salvador ranks 55th and Nepal ranks 56th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf