Estonia vs Tonga: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Estonia
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 2,045 t against 1,898 t in Estonia, a difference of 147 t.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 69th and Tonga ranks 66th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,659 t | 92.33 t | 7,566 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 1,684 t | 1,730 t | 47 t | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Estonia or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 2,045 t against 1,898 t in Estonia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Estonia and Tonga?
- 147 t, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Tonga?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Estonia and Tonga rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Estonia ranks 69th and Tonga ranks 66th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf