Gabon vs Madagascar: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Gabon
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 1,721 t against 1,631 t in Gabon, a difference of 90 t.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Gabon ahead.
Gabon ranks 71st and Madagascar ranks 70th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,555 t | 350.71 t | 2,205 t | Gabon |
| 2010s | 1,140 t | 1,453 t | 312.5 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Gabon or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 1,721 t against 1,631 t in Gabon as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Gabon and Madagascar?
- 90 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Madagascar?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Gabon and Madagascar rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Gabon ranks 71st and Madagascar ranks 70th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf