Ghana vs Nicaragua: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Ghana
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 33,986 t against 33,739 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 247 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 33rd and Nicaragua ranks 34th of 106 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,721 t | 10,417 t | 1,696 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 25,740 t | 11,094 t | 14,646 t | Ghana |
| 2020s | 27,294 t | 25,474 t | 1,820 t | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Ghana or Nicaragua?
- Ghana, at 33,986 t against 33,739 t in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Ghana and Nicaragua?
- 247 t, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Nicaragua?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Ghana and Nicaragua rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Ghana ranks 33rd and Nicaragua ranks 34th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf