Greece vs Nicaragua: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Greece
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 33,739 t against 28,579 t in Greece, a difference of 5,160 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.2 times Greece's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.
Greece ranks 36th and Nicaragua ranks 34th of 106 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30,856 t | 10,157 t | 20,699 t | Greece |
| 2010s | 33,072 t | 13,090 t | 19,982 t | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Greece or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 33,739 t against 28,579 t in Greece as of 2022.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Greece and Nicaragua?
- 5,160 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Nicaragua?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Greece and Nicaragua rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Greece ranks 36th and Nicaragua ranks 34th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf