Guatemala vs Pakistan: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Guatemala
- Pakistan
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 19,154 t against 16,497 t in Pakistan, a difference of 2,657 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Pakistan ahead.
Guatemala ranks 43rd and Pakistan ranks 45th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,967 t | 4,406 t | 1,438 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 15,786 t | 9,670 t | 6,116 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Guatemala or Pakistan?
- Guatemala, at 19,154 t against 16,497 t in Pakistan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Guatemala and Pakistan?
- 2,657 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Pakistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Guatemala and Pakistan rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Guatemala ranks 43rd and Pakistan ranks 45th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf