Iceland vs Malta: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Iceland
1 t
in 2023
Malta
1 t
in 2011
Iceland rank
97th
Malta rank
97th
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Iceland
- Malta
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1 t against 1 t in Malta, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 97th and Malta ranks 97th of 106 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 465.67 t | 1.67 t | 464 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 1 t | 1 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Iceland or Malta?
- Iceland, at 1 t against 1 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Iceland and Malta?
- 0 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Iceland and Malta rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Iceland ranks 97th and Malta ranks 97th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf