Jordan vs Mexico: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Jordan
231,000 t
in 2011
Mexico
227,435 t
in 2011
Jordan rank
12th
Mexico rank
13th
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Jordan
- Mexico
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 231,000 t against 227,435 t in Mexico, a difference of 3,565 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mexico ahead.
Jordan ranks 12th and Mexico ranks 13th of 106 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 124,756 t | 197,104 t | 72,348 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 129,000 t | 247,184 t | 118,184 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Jordan or Mexico?
- Jordan, at 231,000 t against 227,435 t in Mexico as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Jordan and Mexico?
- 3,565 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mexico?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Jordan and Mexico rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Jordan ranks 12th and Mexico ranks 13th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf