Kenya vs Sweden: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Kenya
- Sweden
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 11,701 t against 7,535 t in Sweden, a difference of 4,166 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.6 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sweden ahead.
Kenya ranks 52nd and Sweden ranks 54th of 106 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 520.5 t | 22,240 t | 21,719 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 5,967 t | 4,228 t | 1,739 t | Kenya |
| 2020s | 10,957 t | 7,535 t | 3,422 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Kenya or Sweden?
- Kenya, at 11,701 t against 7,535 t in Sweden as of 2021.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Kenya and Sweden?
- 4,166 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Kenya and Sweden rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Kenya ranks 52nd and Sweden ranks 54th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf