Latvia vs Panama: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Latvia
- Panama
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 6,413 t against 3,277 t in Panama, a difference of 3,136 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 2.0 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 58th and Panama ranks 61st of 106 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,953 t | 1,644 t | 4,309 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 178 t | 6,511 t | 6,333 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 6,725 t | 3,277 t | 3,448 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Latvia or Panama?
- Latvia, at 6,413 t against 3,277 t in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Latvia and Panama?
- 3,136 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Latvia ranks 58th and Panama ranks 61st of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf