Luxembourg vs Slovenia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Luxembourg
- Slovenia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 983 t against 923 t in Slovenia, a difference of 60 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 78th and Slovenia ranks 79th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,485 t | 606 t | 879 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 875 t | 1,268 t | 392.5 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Luxembourg or Slovenia?
- Luxembourg, at 983 t against 923 t in Slovenia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Luxembourg and Slovenia?
- 60 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Slovenia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Luxembourg and Slovenia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Luxembourg ranks 78th and Slovenia ranks 79th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf