Morocco vs Uruguay: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Morocco
- Uruguay
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 154,844 t against 141,974 t in Uruguay, a difference of 12,870 t.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Morocco ahead.
Morocco ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 16th of 106 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,960 t | 8,369 t | 5,409 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 50,823 t | 72,798 t | 21,976 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Morocco or Uruguay?
- Morocco, at 154,844 t against 141,974 t in Uruguay as of 2015.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Morocco and Uruguay?
- 12,870 t, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Uruguay?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Morocco and Uruguay rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Morocco ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 16th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf