Mozambique vs Uganda: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Mozambique
- Uganda
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 752 t against 410 t in Uganda, a difference of 342 t.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.8 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Uganda ahead.
Mozambique ranks 80th and Uganda ranks 81st of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 114.33 t | 100 t | 14.33 t | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 406.5 t | 473 t | 66.5 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Mozambique or Uganda?
- Mozambique, at 752 t against 410 t in Uganda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Mozambique and Uganda?
- 342 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Mozambique and Uganda rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Mozambique ranks 80th and Uganda ranks 81st of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf