Myanmar vs Senegal: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Myanmar
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 44,517 t against 35,422 t in Myanmar, a difference of 9,095 t.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.3 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Senegal ahead.
Myanmar ranks 31st and Senegal ranks 29th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,001 t | 3,033 t | 1,032 t | Senegal |
| 2010s | 34,497 t | 15,681 t | 18,815 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Myanmar or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 44,517 t against 35,422 t in Myanmar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Myanmar and Senegal?
- 9,095 t, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Senegal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Myanmar and Senegal rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Myanmar ranks 31st and Senegal ranks 29th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf