New Caledonia vs Tunisia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- New Caledonia
- Tunisia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Tunisia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 99th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 t | 1,172 t | 1,167 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 1 t | 0 t | 1 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, New Caledonia or Tunisia?
- New Caledonia, at 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between New Caledonia and Tunisia?
- 0 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do New Caledonia and Tunisia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- New Caledonia ranks 99th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf