Pakistan vs Zambia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Pakistan
- Zambia
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 16,497 t against 14,963 t in Zambia, a difference of 1,534 t.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zambia ahead.
Pakistan ranks 45th and Zambia ranks 48th of 106 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,406 t | 19,036 t | 7,629 t | Zambia |
| 2010s | 9,670 t | 12,938 t | 3,268 t | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Pakistan or Zambia?
- Pakistan, at 16,497 t against 14,963 t in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Pakistan and Zambia?
- 1,534 t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Zambia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Pakistan and Zambia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Pakistan ranks 45th and Zambia ranks 48th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf