Paraguay vs Portugal: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Paraguay
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 66,337 t against 61,909 t in Paraguay, a difference of 4,428 t.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Paraguay ranks 22nd and Portugal ranks 21st of 106 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,123 t | 59,088 t | 54,966 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 43,380 t | 59,966 t | 16,586 t | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Paraguay or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 66,337 t against 61,909 t in Paraguay as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Paraguay and Portugal?
- 4,428 t, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Portugal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Paraguay and Portugal rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Paraguay ranks 22nd and Portugal ranks 21st of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf