Paraguay vs Ukraine: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Paraguay
- Ukraine
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 61,909 t against 53,362 t in Ukraine, a difference of 8,547 t.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.2 times Ukraine's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
Paraguay ranks 22nd and Ukraine ranks 24th of 106 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,805 t | 89,595 t | 84,790 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 43,380 t | 187,906 t | 144,525 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Paraguay or Ukraine?
- Paraguay, at 61,909 t against 53,362 t in Ukraine as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Paraguay and Ukraine?
- 8,547 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Ukraine?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Paraguay and Ukraine rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Paraguay ranks 22nd and Ukraine ranks 24th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf