Peru vs Uruguay: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Peru
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 141,974 t against 105,624 t in Peru, a difference of 36,350 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.3 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 16th of 106 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55,822 t | 9,058 t | 46,764 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 88,705 t | 79,536 t | 9,168 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Peru or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 141,974 t against 105,624 t in Peru as of 2018.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Peru and Uruguay?
- 36,350 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uruguay?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Peru and Uruguay rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Peru ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 16th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf