Romania vs Serbia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Romania
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 49,387 t against 46,538 t in Romania, a difference of 2,849 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 26th of 106 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35,548 t | 68,525 t | 32,976 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 49,121 t | 64,462 t | 15,340 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Romania or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 49,387 t against 46,538 t in Romania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Romania and Serbia?
- 2,849 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2011.
- How do Romania and Serbia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Romania ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 26th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf