Slovenia vs Uganda: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Slovenia
- Uganda
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 923 t against 410 t in Uganda, a difference of 513 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 2.3 times Uganda's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Slovenia ranks 79th and Uganda ranks 81st of 106 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 617.5 t | 82.5 t | 535 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 1,268 t | 473 t | 794.5 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Slovenia or Uganda?
- Slovenia, at 923 t against 410 t in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Slovenia and Uganda?
- 513 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Slovenia and Uganda rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Slovenia ranks 79th and Uganda ranks 81st of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf