Slovenia vs Yemen: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Slovenia
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 1,000 t against 923 t in Slovenia, a difference of 77 t.
That makes Yemen's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Yemen ahead.
Slovenia ranks 79th and Yemen ranks 76th of 106 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 881 t | 1,475 t | 594.4 t | Yemen |
| 2010s | 1,268 t | 1,500 t | 232.5 t | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Slovenia or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 1,000 t against 923 t in Slovenia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Slovenia and Yemen?
- 77 t, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Yemen?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Slovenia and Yemen rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Slovenia ranks 79th and Yemen ranks 76th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf