Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 14,963 t against 12,793 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2,170 t.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zambia ahead.
Zambia ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 106 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Zambia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Zambia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15,100 t | 9,379 t | 5,721 t | Zambia |
| 2010s | 12,938 t | 15,075 t | 2,136 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use, Zambia or Zimbabwe?
- Zambia, at 14,963 t against 12,793 t in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use between Zambia and Zimbabwe?
- 2,170 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Zambia and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Zambia and Zimbabwe rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — agricultural use?
- Zambia ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf