Australia vs Peru: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Australia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 1,770 t against 1,017 t in Australia, a difference of 753 t.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.7 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 52nd and Peru ranks 49th of 115 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 875.33 t | 2,446 t | 1,571 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 471.04 t | 3,440 t | 2,969 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 541.85 t | 2,571 t | 2,030 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Australia or Peru?
- Peru, at 1,770 t against 1,017 t in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Australia and Peru?
- 753 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Peru rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Australia ranks 52nd and Peru ranks 49th of 115 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf