Congo vs Ghana: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Congo
- Ghana
How they compare
Congo currently reports 30 t against 25.08 t in Ghana, a difference of 4.92 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 81st and Ghana ranks 82nd of 108 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 t | 16 t | 34 t | Congo |
| 2010s | 120.58 t | 161.68 t | 41.11 t | Ghana |
| 2020s | 53.55 t | 14.99 t | 38.55 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Congo or Ghana?
- Congo, at 30 t against 25.08 t in Ghana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Congo and Ghana?
- 4.92 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ghana?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Ghana rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Congo ranks 81st and Ghana ranks 82nd of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf