Cyprus vs Finland: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Cyprus
- Finland
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 9 t against 2.5 t in Finland, a difference of 6.5 t.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 3.6 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Finland ahead.
Cyprus ranks 91st and Finland ranks 94th of 108 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.02 t | 1,008 t | 1,008 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 199.83 t | 6.83 t | 193 t | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 4.5 t | 5.89 t | 1.39 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Cyprus or Finland?
- Cyprus, at 9 t against 2.5 t in Finland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Cyprus and Finland?
- 6.5 t, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Finland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Cyprus and Finland rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Cyprus ranks 91st and Finland ranks 94th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf