Denmark vs Pakistan: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Denmark
- Pakistan
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 259.1 t against 215 t in Pakistan, a difference of 44.1 t.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 64th and Pakistan ranks 66th of 108 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.01 t | 698 t | 645.99 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 9,684 t | 338.33 t | 9,346 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Denmark or Pakistan?
- Denmark, at 259.1 t against 215 t in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Denmark and Pakistan?
- 44.1 t, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Pakistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
- How do Denmark and Pakistan rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Denmark ranks 64th and Pakistan ranks 66th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf