Ecuador vs Panama: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Ecuador
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 435 t against 399 t in Ecuador, a difference of 36 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 59th and Panama ranks 57th of 108 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 t | 0.54 t | 3.46 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 18.16 t | 72.34 t | 54.19 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 340 t | 378.31 t | 38.3 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Ecuador or Panama?
- Panama, at 435 t against 399 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Ecuador and Panama?
- 36 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Panama?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Panama rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Ecuador ranks 59th and Panama ranks 57th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf